Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a proper probe for shadowing impl #124844

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative labels May 7, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 7, 2024

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented May 13, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 13, 2024

📌 Commit b39ef8b has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 13, 2024
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
Use a proper probe for shadowing impl

r? lcnr
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 13, 2024

#125079 (comment)
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 13, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 13, 2024

You just need to import bug now that various #[macro_use]s inside compiler/ are gone (#124511, #124914).

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2024

📌 Commit dbd2ca6 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 14, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119838 (style-guide: When breaking binops handle multi-line first operand better)
 - rust-lang#124844 (Use a proper probe for shadowing impl)
 - rust-lang#125047 (Migrate `run-make/issue-14500` to new `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125080 (only find segs chain for missing methods when no available candidates)
 - rust-lang#125088 (Uplift `AliasTy` and `AliasTerm`)
 - rust-lang#125100 (Don't do post-method-probe error reporting steps if we're in a suggestion)
 - rust-lang#125118 (Use new utility functions/methods in run-make tests)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0458d8a into rust-lang:master May 14, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 14, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124844 - compiler-errors:shadow-probe, r=lcnr

Use a proper probe for shadowing impl

r? lcnr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants