rustc --explain E0582 additional example
#124746
Open
+34
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pnkfelix (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
pnkfelix
reviewed
May 14, 2024
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2024
…types-improvement, r=pnkfelix `rustc --explain E0582` additional example ## Context *From rust-lang#124744* Expands the example for E0582, an error ensuring that lifetime in a function's return type is sufficiently constrained (e.g. actually tied to some input type), to show an additional example where one sees the lifetime occurring syntactically among the relevant function input types, but is nonetheless rejected by rustc because a syntactic occurrence is not always sufficient.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2024
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124746 (`rustc --explain E0582` additional example) - rust-lang#124975 (Use an helper to move the files) - rust-lang#125027 (Migrate `run-make/c-link-to-rust-staticlib` to `rmake`) - rust-lang#125084 (`rustc_hir_typeck`: Account for `skipped_ref_pats` in `expr_use_visitor`) - rust-lang#125104 (Migrate `run-make/no-cdylib-as-rdylib` to `rmake`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Co-authored-by: Felix S Klock II <pnkfelix@pnkfx.org>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
From #124744
Expands the example for E0582, an error ensuring that lifetime in a function's return type is sufficiently constrained (e.g. actually tied to some input type), to show an additional example where one sees the lifetime occurring syntactically among the relevant function input types, but is nonetheless rejected by rustc because a syntactic occurrence is not always sufficient.