Add Default to Clippy Lints Lint groups

[unvalley]

• related to Improve filtering options for Clippy's lint list #7958

This PR adds a default (reset) button to Clippy Lints Lint groups. (change for website)
The page sets only Deprecated to false by default.
Certainly it is easy to set only deprecated to false, but it may be a bit lazy for beginners.

Screen.Recording.2022-10-10.at.17.58.52.mov

changelog: none

[rust-highfive]

r? @dswij

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[flip1995]

r? @xFrednet I think you are the best reviewer for this.

Should the Default option enable all lints that are warn-by-default, instead of all groups except for deprecated? That would've been what I expected.

The All option can also just set deprecated to false IMO.

[xFrednet]

Overall looks good to me, two smaller suggestions

[xFrednet]

This should always be true, shouldn't it?

[xFrednet]

Should the Default option enable all lints that are warn-by-default, instead of all groups except for deprecated? That would've been what I expected.

I think default should reset to the default of the lint list. If we only want it to be warn-by-default lints, then that should also be the default of the list IMO. With context, I think that this is already covered by the lint level selection. We could maybe add a second button, which is clippy::all 🤔

[unvalley]

@xFrednet Thanks, I added a commit for your suggestion.

[flip1995]

Should the Default option enable all lints that are warn-by-default, instead of all groups except for deprecated? That would've been what I expected.

I think default should reset to the default of the lint list. If we only want it to be warn-by-default lints, then that should also be the default of the list IMO. With context, I think that this is already covered by the lint level selection. We could maybe add a second button, which is clippy::all thinking

Makes sense to me. I don't think there is a need for a button for clippy::all, as long as we also have sorting by lint level (I forgot about this). So the original implementation of this PR SGTM.

[xFrednet]

Looks good to me and runs perfectly. Thank you for the changes!

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 178799f has been approved by xFrednet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 178799f with merge 122ae22...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing 122ae22 to master...