New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added constructor return type for wasm32 target #1877
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -495,7 +495,15 @@ impl FunctionSig { | |
} else { | ||
ty.ret_type().ok_or(ParseError::Continue)? | ||
}; | ||
let ret = Item::from_ty_or_ref(ty_ret_type, cursor, None, ctx); | ||
|
||
let ret = if ctx.is_target_wasm32() && is_constructor { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can we switch the order here, Also, can we add a test for this? Should be doable passing There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added a commit which addresses both of these comments. |
||
// Constructors in Clang wasm32 target return a pointer to the object | ||
// being constructed. | ||
let void = Item::builtin_type(TypeKind::Void, false, ctx); | ||
Item::builtin_type(TypeKind::Pointer(void), false, ctx) | ||
} else { | ||
Item::from_ty_or_ref(ty_ret_type, cursor, None, ctx) | ||
}; | ||
|
||
// Clang plays with us at "find the calling convention", see #549 and | ||
// co. This seems to be a better fix than that commit. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This won't work if building with clang 4 or 3.9 (target_info will be null), but maybe that's fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I doubt that wasm backend even existed for those versions of clang and as such I don't think what would be an issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still need to update the test expectations for these two versions, as we run CI on those. To do that you need to add the file in
tests/expectations/tests/libclang-3.9
(and same for 4).With that bit, this patch looks great, thank you!