New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allows the default git/gitoxide configuration to be obtained from the ENV and config #13687
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I assume this is meant to resolve the immediate part of #13688 (leaving aside the more general problem). Is that right? |
src/cargo/core/features.rs
Outdated
@@ -908,15 +914,19 @@ fn parse_git(it: impl Iterator<Item = impl AsRef<str>>) -> CargoResult<Option<Gi | |||
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, Default, Deserialize)] | |||
pub struct GitoxideFeatures { | |||
/// All fetches are done with `gitoxide`, which includes git dependencies as well as the crates index. | |||
#[serde(default = "default_true")] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume these were chosen to align with GitoxideFeatures::safe()
and to mirror if you do -Zgitoxide
However, this breaks down if you do CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE_FETCH=true
, then almost everything else becomes enabled (we should have a test to show this case).
Some other challenges with these defaults
- Unclear what the motivation is (could have comment pointing to
GitoxideFeature::safe
) - Challenge in keeping in sync with
GitoxideFeature::safe
Should we instead just default everything to false?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I would love to just work is CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE=fetch,list_files
and CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE=true
mirroring the CLI flag (which would also imply you could have unstable.gitoxide = "fetch,list_files"
in the config file).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah maybe we can make it a comma separated list to reduce the complexity.
Wonder do people really use individual gitoxide features? I always assume that people would just enable them as a whole, though gitoxide author recommends keeping them separately: #13252 (comment).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I would love to just work is CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE=fetch,list_files and CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE=true mirroring the CLI flag (which would also imply you could have unstable.gitoxide = "fetch,list_files" in the config file).
So what we defined as table is going to be replaced with a string? It makes sense, I have no objection to this, but it is not clear that it will break the configuration of the previous version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's possible to support both, via #[serde(deserialize_with = ...)]
and a custom deserializer that handles a string/list or a struct, like
cargo/src/cargo/util/context/mod.rs
Line 2673 in 88d55a8
fn progress_or_string<'de, D>(deserializer: D) -> Result<Option<ProgressConfig>, D::Error> |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #13696) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
r? weihanglo |
7ec8544
to
e852649
Compare
- pass 'all' to enable all predefind git/gitoxide features - stil support parse git/gitoxide as table in Config, but not support parser table in ENV
e852649
to
b5fd826
Compare
In my new commit, a string can be parsed as git/gitoxide features in ENV and Config.
In Config, the git/gitoxide can be defined as
But the defect is that the fields as ENV will be ignored.
In ENV, it seems that a struct cann't be parser from string and table in the sametime. |
Yes,this tend to mirror the -Zgit/-Zgitoxide as possible. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the late review 🙇🏾♂️
// then run `CARGO_UNSTABLE_GIT_SHALLOW_INDEX cargo fetch`, here will return `missing config key unstable.git`. | ||
// It seems that anything that starts with CARGO_UNSTABLE_GIT, even like CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE can trigger this. | ||
// This is a workaround for now, but should be fixed in the future. | ||
visitor.visit_none() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this seems fine for now, I am a bit worried about the change.
What about having an enum deriving serde?
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, Default, Deserialize)]
#[serde(untagged)]
pub enum Gitoxide {
#[default]
All,
Some(GitoxideFeatures),
}
so that I assumed it would work well with
[unstable]
gitoxide = true
# or
[unstable.gitoxide]
checkout = true
As well as enviroment variables?
CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE=true
CARGO_UNSTABLE_GITOXIDE_CHECKOUT=true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't seem to be working. see gitoxide_features_as_table
in the lastest commit.
What does this PR try to resolve?
The default git/gitoxide feautures config can be obtained througt
-Zgit
and-Zgitoxide
.However, it cannot be obtained from environment variables or configurations.
It's not very ergonomic.
How should we test and review this PR?
The previous commit explained the staus quo, the next commit addressed the problem.
Additional information
Inspired by #11813 (comment)
See also #13285 (comment)