Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Unrolled build for rust-lang#124217
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124217 - Zalathar:pre-branch, r=oli-obk

coverage: Prepare for improved branch coverage

When trying to rebase my new branch coverage work (including rust-lang#124154) on top of the introduction of MC/DC coverage (rust-lang#123409), I found it a lot harder than anticipated. With the benefit of hindsight, the branch coverage code and MC/DC code have become more interdependent than I'm happy with.

This PR therefore disentangles them a bit, so that it will be easier for both areas of code to evolve independently without interference.

---

This PR also includes a few extra branch coverage tests that I had sitting around from my current branch coverage work. They mostly just demonstrate that certain language constructs listed in rust-lang#124118 currently don't have branch coverage support.

``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
  • Loading branch information
rust-timer committed Apr 23, 2024
2 parents 25087e0 + 2b6adb0 commit 9a5cd84
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 26 changed files with 993 additions and 94 deletions.
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs
Expand Up @@ -314,7 +314,9 @@ impl Default for ConditionInfo {
#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct MCDCBranchSpan {
pub span: Span,
pub condition_info: ConditionInfo,
/// If `None`, this actually represents a normal branch span inserted for
/// code that was too complex for MC/DC.
pub condition_info: Option<ConditionInfo>,
pub true_marker: BlockMarkerId,
pub false_marker: BlockMarkerId,
}
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs
Expand Up @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ fn write_coverage_branch_info(
writeln!(
w,
"{INDENT}coverage mcdc branch {{ condition_id: {:?}, true: {true_marker:?}, false: {false_marker:?} }} => {span:?}",
condition_info.condition_id
condition_info.map(|info| info.condition_id)
)?;
}

Expand Down
103 changes: 55 additions & 48 deletions compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/coverageinfo.rs
Expand Up @@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{
BlockMarkerId, BranchSpan, ConditionId, ConditionInfo, CoverageKind, MCDCBranchSpan,
MCDCDecisionSpan,
};
use rustc_middle::mir::{self, BasicBlock, UnOp};
use rustc_middle::mir::{self, BasicBlock, SourceInfo, UnOp};
use rustc_middle::thir::{ExprId, ExprKind, LogicalOp, Thir};
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
use rustc_span::def_id::LocalDefId;
use rustc_span::Span;

use crate::build::Builder;
use crate::build::{Builder, CFG};
use crate::errors::MCDCExceedsConditionNumLimit;

pub(crate) struct BranchInfoBuilder {
Expand All @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ pub(crate) struct BranchInfoBuilder {

num_block_markers: usize,
branch_spans: Vec<BranchSpan>,

mcdc_branch_spans: Vec<MCDCBranchSpan>,
mcdc_decision_spans: Vec<MCDCDecisionSpan>,
mcdc_state: Option<MCDCState>,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -95,13 +96,7 @@ impl BranchInfoBuilder {
}
}

fn record_conditions_operation(&mut self, logical_op: LogicalOp, span: Span) {
if let Some(mcdc_state) = self.mcdc_state.as_mut() {
mcdc_state.record_conditions(logical_op, span);
}
}

fn fetch_condition_info(
fn fetch_mcdc_condition_info(
&mut self,
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
true_marker: BlockMarkerId,
Expand All @@ -121,14 +116,9 @@ impl BranchInfoBuilder {
_ => {
// Do not generate mcdc mappings and statements for decisions with too many conditions.
let rebase_idx = self.mcdc_branch_spans.len() - decision.conditions_num + 1;
let to_normal_branches = self.mcdc_branch_spans.split_off(rebase_idx);
self.branch_spans.extend(to_normal_branches.into_iter().map(
|MCDCBranchSpan { span, true_marker, false_marker, .. }| BranchSpan {
span,
true_marker,
false_marker,
},
));
for branch in &mut self.mcdc_branch_spans[rebase_idx..] {
branch.condition_info = None;
}

// ConditionInfo of this branch shall also be reset.
condition_info = None;
Expand All @@ -144,20 +134,50 @@ impl BranchInfoBuilder {
condition_info
}

fn add_two_way_branch<'tcx>(
&mut self,
cfg: &mut CFG<'tcx>,
source_info: SourceInfo,
true_block: BasicBlock,
false_block: BasicBlock,
) {
let true_marker = self.inject_block_marker(cfg, source_info, true_block);
let false_marker = self.inject_block_marker(cfg, source_info, false_block);

self.branch_spans.push(BranchSpan { span: source_info.span, true_marker, false_marker });
}

fn next_block_marker_id(&mut self) -> BlockMarkerId {
let id = BlockMarkerId::from_usize(self.num_block_markers);
self.num_block_markers += 1;
id
}

fn inject_block_marker(
&mut self,
cfg: &mut CFG<'_>,
source_info: SourceInfo,
block: BasicBlock,
) -> BlockMarkerId {
let id = self.next_block_marker_id();

let marker_statement = mir::Statement {
source_info,
kind: mir::StatementKind::Coverage(CoverageKind::BlockMarker { id }),
};
cfg.push(block, marker_statement);

id
}

pub(crate) fn into_done(self) -> Option<Box<mir::coverage::BranchInfo>> {
let Self {
nots: _,
num_block_markers,
branch_spans,
mcdc_branch_spans,
mcdc_decision_spans,
..
mcdc_state: _,
} = self;

if num_block_markers == 0 {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -325,7 +345,7 @@ impl Builder<'_, '_> {
mut else_block: BasicBlock,
) {
// Bail out if branch coverage is not enabled for this function.
let Some(branch_info) = self.coverage_branch_info.as_ref() else { return };
let Some(branch_info) = self.coverage_branch_info.as_mut() else { return };

// If this condition expression is nested within one or more `!` expressions,
// replace it with the enclosing `!` collected by `visit_unary_not`.
Expand All @@ -335,47 +355,34 @@ impl Builder<'_, '_> {
std::mem::swap(&mut then_block, &mut else_block);
}
}
let source_info = self.source_info(self.thir[expr_id].span);

// Now that we have `source_info`, we can upgrade to a &mut reference.
let branch_info = self.coverage_branch_info.as_mut().expect("upgrading & to &mut");

let mut inject_branch_marker = |block: BasicBlock| {
let id = branch_info.next_block_marker_id();

let marker_statement = mir::Statement {
source_info,
kind: mir::StatementKind::Coverage(CoverageKind::BlockMarker { id }),
};
self.cfg.push(block, marker_statement);

id
};

let true_marker = inject_branch_marker(then_block);
let false_marker = inject_branch_marker(else_block);
let source_info = SourceInfo { span: self.thir[expr_id].span, scope: self.source_scope };

if let Some(condition_info) =
branch_info.fetch_condition_info(self.tcx, true_marker, false_marker)
{
// Separate path for handling branches when MC/DC is enabled.
if branch_info.mcdc_state.is_some() {
let mut inject_block_marker =
|block| branch_info.inject_block_marker(&mut self.cfg, source_info, block);
let true_marker = inject_block_marker(then_block);
let false_marker = inject_block_marker(else_block);
let condition_info =
branch_info.fetch_mcdc_condition_info(self.tcx, true_marker, false_marker);
branch_info.mcdc_branch_spans.push(MCDCBranchSpan {
span: source_info.span,
condition_info,
true_marker,
false_marker,
});
} else {
branch_info.branch_spans.push(BranchSpan {
span: source_info.span,
true_marker,
false_marker,
});
return;
}

branch_info.add_two_way_branch(&mut self.cfg, source_info, then_block, else_block);
}

pub(crate) fn visit_coverage_branch_operation(&mut self, logical_op: LogicalOp, span: Span) {
if let Some(branch_info) = self.coverage_branch_info.as_mut() {
branch_info.record_conditions_operation(logical_op, span);
if let Some(branch_info) = self.coverage_branch_info.as_mut()
&& let Some(mcdc_state) = branch_info.mcdc_state.as_mut()
{
mcdc_state.record_conditions(logical_op, span);
}
}
}
38 changes: 26 additions & 12 deletions compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ mod tests;

use self::counters::{CounterIncrementSite, CoverageCounters};
use self::graph::{BasicCoverageBlock, CoverageGraph};
use self::spans::{BcbMapping, BcbMappingKind, CoverageSpans};
use self::spans::{BcbBranchPair, BcbMapping, BcbMappingKind, CoverageSpans};

use crate::MirPass;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -141,21 +141,25 @@ fn create_mappings<'tcx>(

let mut mappings = Vec::new();

mappings.extend(coverage_spans.all_bcb_mappings().filter_map(
mappings.extend(coverage_spans.mappings.iter().filter_map(
|BcbMapping { kind: bcb_mapping_kind, span }| {
let kind = match *bcb_mapping_kind {
BcbMappingKind::Code(bcb) => MappingKind::Code(term_for_bcb(bcb)),
BcbMappingKind::Branch { true_bcb, false_bcb } => MappingKind::Branch {
true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb),
false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb),
},
BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info } => {
MappingKind::MCDCBranch {
BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info: None } => {
MappingKind::Branch {
true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb),
false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb),
mcdc_params: condition_info,
}
}
BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch {
true_bcb,
false_bcb,
condition_info: Some(mcdc_params),
} => MappingKind::MCDCBranch {
true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb),
false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb),
mcdc_params,
},
BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx, conditions_num, .. } => {
MappingKind::MCDCDecision(DecisionInfo { bitmap_idx, conditions_num })
}
Expand All @@ -165,6 +169,16 @@ fn create_mappings<'tcx>(
},
));

mappings.extend(coverage_spans.branch_pairs.iter().filter_map(
|&BcbBranchPair { span, true_bcb, false_bcb }| {
let true_term = term_for_bcb(true_bcb);
let false_term = term_for_bcb(false_bcb);
let kind = MappingKind::Branch { true_term, false_term };
let code_region = make_code_region(source_map, file_name, span, body_span)?;
Some(Mapping { kind, code_region })
},
));

mappings
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -233,7 +247,7 @@ fn inject_mcdc_statements<'tcx>(

// Inject test vector update first because `inject_statement` always insert new statement at head.
for (end_bcbs, bitmap_idx) in
coverage_spans.all_bcb_mappings().filter_map(|mapping| match &mapping.kind {
coverage_spans.mappings.iter().filter_map(|mapping| match &mapping.kind {
BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { end_bcbs, bitmap_idx, .. } => {
Some((end_bcbs, *bitmap_idx))
}
Expand All @@ -247,9 +261,9 @@ fn inject_mcdc_statements<'tcx>(
}

for (true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_id) in
coverage_spans.all_bcb_mappings().filter_map(|mapping| match mapping.kind {
coverage_spans.mappings.iter().filter_map(|mapping| match mapping.kind {
BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info } => {
Some((true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info.condition_id))
Some((true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info?.condition_id))
}
_ => None,
})
Expand Down
47 changes: 34 additions & 13 deletions compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/spans.rs
Expand Up @@ -15,13 +15,17 @@ mod from_mir;
pub(super) enum BcbMappingKind {
/// Associates an ordinary executable code span with its corresponding BCB.
Code(BasicCoverageBlock),
/// Associates a branch span with BCBs for its true and false arms.
Branch { true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock },

// Ordinary branch mappings are stored separately, so they don't have a
// variant in this enum.
//
/// Associates a mcdc branch span with condition info besides fields for normal branch.
MCDCBranch {
true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock,
false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock,
condition_info: ConditionInfo,
/// If `None`, this actually represents a normal branch mapping inserted
/// for code that was too complex for MC/DC.
condition_info: Option<ConditionInfo>,
},
/// Associates a mcdc decision with its join BCB.
MCDCDecision { end_bcbs: BTreeSet<BasicCoverageBlock>, bitmap_idx: u32, conditions_num: u16 },
Expand All @@ -33,9 +37,20 @@ pub(super) struct BcbMapping {
pub(super) span: Span,
}

/// This is separate from [`BcbMappingKind`] to help prepare for larger changes
/// that will be needed for improved branch coverage in the future.
/// (See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124217>.)
#[derive(Debug)]
pub(super) struct BcbBranchPair {
pub(super) span: Span,
pub(super) true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock,
pub(super) false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock,
}

pub(super) struct CoverageSpans {
bcb_has_mappings: BitSet<BasicCoverageBlock>,
mappings: Vec<BcbMapping>,
pub(super) mappings: Vec<BcbMapping>,
pub(super) branch_pairs: Vec<BcbBranchPair>,
test_vector_bitmap_bytes: u32,
}

Expand All @@ -44,10 +59,6 @@ impl CoverageSpans {
self.bcb_has_mappings.contains(bcb)
}

pub(super) fn all_bcb_mappings(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &BcbMapping> {
self.mappings.iter()
}

pub(super) fn test_vector_bitmap_bytes(&self) -> u32 {
self.test_vector_bitmap_bytes
}
Expand All @@ -63,6 +74,7 @@ pub(super) fn generate_coverage_spans(
basic_coverage_blocks: &CoverageGraph,
) -> Option<CoverageSpans> {
let mut mappings = vec![];
let mut branch_pairs = vec![];

if hir_info.is_async_fn {
// An async function desugars into a function that returns a future,
Expand All @@ -84,14 +96,20 @@ pub(super) fn generate_coverage_spans(
BcbMapping { kind: BcbMappingKind::Code(bcb), span }
}));

mappings.extend(from_mir::extract_branch_mappings(
branch_pairs.extend(from_mir::extract_branch_pairs(
mir_body,
hir_info,
basic_coverage_blocks,
));

mappings.extend(from_mir::extract_mcdc_mappings(
mir_body,
hir_info.body_span,
basic_coverage_blocks,
));
}

if mappings.is_empty() {
if mappings.is_empty() && branch_pairs.is_empty() {
return None;
}

Expand All @@ -104,8 +122,7 @@ pub(super) fn generate_coverage_spans(
for BcbMapping { kind, span: _ } in &mappings {
match *kind {
BcbMappingKind::Code(bcb) => insert(bcb),
BcbMappingKind::Branch { true_bcb, false_bcb }
| BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, .. } => {
BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, .. } => {
insert(true_bcb);
insert(false_bcb);
}
Expand All @@ -118,8 +135,12 @@ pub(super) fn generate_coverage_spans(
}
}
}
for &BcbBranchPair { true_bcb, false_bcb, .. } in &branch_pairs {
insert(true_bcb);
insert(false_bcb);
}

Some(CoverageSpans { bcb_has_mappings, mappings, test_vector_bitmap_bytes })
Some(CoverageSpans { bcb_has_mappings, mappings, branch_pairs, test_vector_bitmap_bytes })
}

#[derive(Debug)]
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9a5cd84

Please sign in to comment.