New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standard derives for error types #30
Conversation
I think this is ready for review / rebase and another run on Travis. |
No need of rebase, it's already on top of master and uses newly released version. Closed & opened to re-run Travis |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Concept ACK, but needs a rebase. Please remove the draft marker when you think it's ready.
Cargo.toml
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
[package] | |||
name = "bitcoin-bech32" | |||
version = "0.11.0" | |||
version = "0.11.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
needs a version bump after the bech32m release
Cargo.toml
Outdated
@@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ license = "MIT" | |||
strict = [] | |||
|
|||
[dependencies] | |||
bech32 = "0.7.1" | |||
bech32 = "0.7.3" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needs a bump to at least 0.8.0, maybe we also need a new release to add some derives there? Or maybe that was already included in 0.8.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New derives went in before 0.8.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still, having 0.8 will be better, or not?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's right. We depend on 0.8.0 for the Bech32m support from #31 .
116ef60
to
5e9fdb7
Compare
@sgeisler done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 5e9fdb7
can we have a release also pls? |
0.12.1 has been released on crates.io |
Based on rust-bitcoin/rust-bech32#49, will be ready for merge once new version of
rust-bech32
will be published