Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix #8664] Fix a false positive for Naming/BinaryOperatorParameterName #8665

Conversation

koic
Copy link
Member

@koic koic commented Sep 8, 2020

Fixes #8664.

This PR fixes a false positive for Naming/BinaryOperatorParameterName when naming multibyte characters method name.


Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

  • Wrote good commit messages.
  • Commit message starts with [Fix #issue-number] (if the related issue exists).
  • Feature branch is up-to-date with master (if not - rebase it).
  • Squashed related commits together.
  • Added tests.
  • Added an entry to the Changelog if the new code introduces user-observable changes. See changelog entry format.
  • The PR relates to only one subject with a clear title and description in grammatically correct, complete sentences.
  • Run bundle exec rake default. It executes all tests and RuboCop for itself, and generates the documentation.

@koic koic force-pushed the fix_false_positive_for_naming_binary_operator_parameter_name branch 2 times, most recently from 7bd1416 to 92d66cb Compare September 8, 2020 03:21
…ameterName`

Fixes rubocop#8664.

This PR fixes a false positive for `Naming/BinaryOperatorParameterName`
when naming multibyte character method name.
@bbatsov bbatsov merged commit 81a27f8 into rubocop:master Sep 8, 2020
@bbatsov
Copy link
Collaborator

bbatsov commented Sep 8, 2020

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False positive Naming/BinaryOperatorParameterName detection
2 participants