[Fix #10489] Fix a false positive for Lint/LambdaWithoutLiteralBlock

Fixes #10489.

This PR fixes a false positive for `Lint/LambdaWithoutLiteralBlock`
when using lambda with a symbol proc.

changelog/fix_a_false_positive_for_lint_lambda_without_literal_block.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+* [#10489](https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop/issues/10489): Fix a false positive for `Lint/LambdaWithoutLiteralBlock` when using lambda with a symbol proc. ([@koic][])

lib/rubocop/cop/lint/lambda_without_literal_block.rb

@@ -31,8 +31,15 @@ class LambdaWithoutLiteralBlock < Base
         MSG = 'lambda without a literal block is deprecated; use the proc without lambda instead.'
         RESTRICT_ON_SEND = %i[lambda].freeze
 
+        # @!method lambda_with_symbol_proc?(node)
+        def_node_matcher :lambda_with_symbol_proc?, <<~PATTERN
+          (send nil? :lambda (block_pass (sym _)))
+        PATTERN
+
         def on_send(node)
-          return if node.parent&.block_type? || !node.first_argument
+          if node.parent&.block_type? || !node.first_argument || lambda_with_symbol_proc?(node)
+            return
+          end
 
           add_offense(node) do |corrector|
             corrector.replace(node, node.first_argument.source.delete('&'))

spec/rubocop/cop/lint/lambda_without_literal_block_spec.rb

@@ -47,4 +47,10 @@
       lambda.call
     RUBY
   end
+
+  it 'does not register an offense when using lambda with a symbol proc' do
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~RUBY)
+      lambda(&:do_something)
+    RUBY
+  end
 end