package-name required for linting large metapackage project

[SteveMacenski]

Description

** clear and concise description of the bug is **

I'm looking to add the linter stage to Nav2, which contains a large number of growing packages

Expected Behavior

** clear and concise description of what you expected to happen **

Not have to manually specify each

Actual Behavior

** clear and concise description of what actually happened. include copied logs whenever possible **

Have to manually specify each package-name

Additional context

** Add any other context about the problem here **

Can this not simply test for all set linters for all packages it finds?

[SteveMacenski]

A wildcard in strings works "*", can that not just be made the default? EZ-PZ solution

[christophebedard]

Seems like a useful change that wouldn't break any existing workflows. The only downside is that, if you're building ROS 2 from source along with your package(s), it would run linters on all those packages too. However, that's only one use-case, and you can just manually specify the package names in that case.

Would you be willing to submit a PR? Otherwise I can get to it eventually.

[SteveMacenski]

#369