feat(rome_js_parser): optional variance annotation

[IWANABETHATGUY]

Summary

part of #2400

current:
File Based Average Prettier Similarity: 72.69%
Line Based Average Prettier Similarity: 67.25%

main:
File Based Average Prettier Similarity: 72.65%
Line Based Average Prettier Similarity: 67.13%

Test Plan

I took test cases from esbuild evanw/esbuild#2102, the original test case of Typescript pull request related to semantics, which we don't care too much about. esbuild Optional variance annotations pull request test case is more suitable for us.

[IWANABETHATGUY]

!bench_parser

[github-actions]

Parser Benchmark Results

group                                 main                                   pr
-----                                 ----                                   --
parser/checker.ts                     1.12    136.6±2.57ms    19.0 MB/sec    1.00    122.3±2.32ms    21.2 MB/sec
parser/compiler.js                    1.00     70.3±1.38ms    14.9 MB/sec    1.11     78.3±3.85ms    13.4 MB/sec
parser/d3.min.js                      1.01     42.9±0.70ms     6.1 MB/sec    1.00     42.6±0.73ms     6.2 MB/sec
parser/dojo.js                        1.01      3.8±0.01ms    18.2 MB/sec    1.00      3.7±0.00ms    18.4 MB/sec
parser/ios.d.ts                       1.05    106.2±1.86ms    17.6 MB/sec    1.00    101.6±1.95ms    18.4 MB/sec
parser/jquery.min.js                  1.01     11.1±0.03ms     7.4 MB/sec    1.00     11.0±0.03ms     7.5 MB/sec
parser/math.js                        1.00     84.9±1.56ms     7.6 MB/sec    1.00     84.8±1.35ms     7.6 MB/sec
parser/parser.ts                      1.02      2.6±0.01ms    18.3 MB/sec    1.00      2.6±0.00ms    18.7 MB/sec
parser/pixi.min.js                    1.01     51.9±1.08ms     8.5 MB/sec    1.00     51.7±1.59ms     8.5 MB/sec
parser/react-dom.production.min.js    1.15     17.5±0.13ms     6.6 MB/sec    1.00     15.2±0.06ms     7.6 MB/sec
parser/react.production.min.js        1.01    834.6±1.39µs     7.4 MB/sec    1.00    826.4±0.72µs     7.4 MB/sec
parser/router.ts                      1.02      2.2±0.01ms    28.1 MB/sec    1.00      2.1±0.00ms    28.6 MB/sec
parser/tex-chtml-full.js              1.03    116.6±1.61ms     7.8 MB/sec    1.00    112.9±2.97ms     8.1 MB/sec
parser/three.min.js                   1.00     60.2±1.09ms     9.8 MB/sec    1.00     60.3±1.47ms     9.7 MB/sec
parser/typescript.js                  1.01    526.3±6.63ms    18.0 MB/sec    1.00    523.5±7.09ms    18.1 MB/sec
parser/vue.global.prod.js             1.01     19.0±0.12ms     6.3 MB/sec    1.00     18.9±0.15ms     6.4 MB/sec

[IWANABETHATGUY]

This pull request is pretty big, so I prefer to separate the optional variance annotation formatting another pr

[IWANABETHATGUY]

@MichaReiser , @ematipico could we make some progress here ? Since prettier has been landed Ts 4.7, prettier/prettier#12900

[MichaReiser]

I find true/false parameters hard to understand. Having a parse_ts_type_parameters_impl function that takes a boolean parameter is fine but I would probably expose a parse_ts_type_parameters and a ts_type_parameters_with_modifiers function instead to make the difference clear.

[IWANABETHATGUY]

The only thing I want to argue is that the only difference between parse_ts_type_parameters_impl and parse_ts_type_parameters would be https://github.com/IWANABETHATGUY/tools/blob/d8dd387ec11b49fe46da005c53f7ed17aa34e387/crates/rome_js_parser/src/syntax/typescript/types.rs#L110-L111, Is this duplication acceptable ?

[IWANABETHATGUY]

@MichaReiser， any thought about this?