Order types, interfaces, classes and object members #2730
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lukastaegert
force-pushed
the
order-members
branch
from
1fa957e
to
97c77a4
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains:
Are tests included?
Breaking Changes?
List any relevant issue numbers:
Description
Just something I wanted to have for a long time. This PR does not contain any functional changes but adds and adapts to new lint rules regarding the ordering (alphabetical) of types, interfaces, classes, and objects.
The intention is to have a consistent ordering across various similar classes etc. and reduce merge diffs in the future.