Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[@rollup/plugin-terser] Increase performance by running in parallel workers #1334

Closed
dasa opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@dasa
Copy link
Contributor

dasa commented Nov 1, 2022

  • Rollup Plugin Name: @rollup/plugin-terser
  • Rollup Plugin Version: 0.1.0

Feature Use Case

This is missing compared to the rollup-plugin-terser implementation. This was noted at: #1323 (comment)

I'm seeing a four minute slowdown as compared to using the rollup-plugin-terser plugin when building about 3,500 files.

Feature Proposal

This would be automatic as it was in the rollup-plugin-terser plugin. rollup-plugin-terser relied on jest-worker, but maybe https://nodejs.org/api/worker_threads.html could now be used instead.

@dasa dasa mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2022
9 tasks
@tada5hi tada5hi self-assigned this Nov 5, 2022
@tada5hi
Copy link
Member

tada5hi commented Nov 5, 2022

I will devote myself to that ✌️ ☺️

@tada5hi
Copy link
Member

tada5hi commented Nov 10, 2022

Sorry for the delay guys 😔
I had a few things to do these days.

Besides that i "wasted" my time on routup lightweight and extendable http interface based routing framework (alternative to express) 😁 .
I would be very happy if you would try it out, leave feedback or contribute to it ❤️

#1341

@tada5hi
Copy link
Member

tada5hi commented Nov 22, 2022

This issue should be solved soon and closed soon ✌️😊. Waiting fo shellscape to merge the pr.

@michaelfaith
Copy link

michaelfaith commented Nov 22, 2022

Waiting fo shellscape to merge the pr.

Seems like there's a bit more work to finalize the pr.

@tada5hi
Copy link
Member

tada5hi commented Nov 22, 2022

i would not call it work, rather suggestions and questions from @dasa.

@michaelfaith
Copy link

Fair enough. I just meant it was still WIP and not simply waiting on merge. Appreciate your work on it. 🍻

@tada5hi tada5hi closed this as completed Jan 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants