New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error prone and google format fix annotation module #7154
Error prone and google format fix annotation module #7154
Conversation
@hellosagar you can rebase on your old PR, and force-push to your branch without closing your old PR. Those are commands I often used to rebase on lastest master branch for my PR: git fetch --all
git checkout my_branch
git rebase -i upstream/master
# squash or cherry-pick your commits, and delete commits you don't want with terminal and save your operation.
git push origin HEAD:my_branch -f |
Thanks for sharing the sample, usually I avoid git force pus. but In these kind a cases it make sense to use it 👍🏻 |
Yup, we should avoid using |
eb6d350
to
285a224
Compare
@hellosagar It's recommended to rebase on master branch, instead of cherry-picking those commits separately. |
@utzcoz got it, yeah i will first rebase my master branch and synced it with my local branch |
6663187
to
ba5723a
Compare
@hellosagar you can checkout to you commit for this PR, rebase it on latest master branch and push it to your branch forcibly. |
…va format for annotation module
ba5723a
to
faf0dfd
Compare
Thanks, I think its looking fine now |
What I did wrong previously, do you know exactly ? I mean in terms how other persons commits showing as mine which is authored by someone else |
Hi @hoisie could you help to review this PR? IMO, it's ready to be merged. |
Maybe you use some commands like |
Thanks @hellosagar. Congrats to your first PR. |
Overview
Fixed the error-prone warning and added the google java style format for the annotations module
Proposed Changes
So, the only error warning for the annotation module was
UnrecognisedJavadocTag
, and I've fixed that by converting the comment from previously this:to this now:
Which has the same effect on Javadoc rendering
and other than this its mostly, google's java format style changes