Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub Workflows security hardening #2066

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sashashura
Copy link

This PR adds explicit permissions section to workflows. This is a security best practice because by default workflows run with extended set of permissions (except from on: pull_request from external forks). By specifying any permission explicitly all others are set to none. By using the principle of least privilege the damage a compromised workflow can do (because of an injection or compromised third party tool or action) is restricted.
It is recommended to have most strict permissions on the top level and grant write permissions on job level case by case.

Signed-off-by: Alex <aleksandrosansan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex <aleksandrosansan@gmail.com>
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 25, 2022

Deploy Preview for nodemon ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 296410a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/nodemon/deploys/6330699cd75517000979903e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2066--nodemon.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@sashashura
Copy link
Author

@remy could you please review?

@sashashura
Copy link
Author

An example of a workflow run with unrestricted permissions:
image

@remy
Copy link
Owner

remy commented Jul 8, 2023

I don't really understand the impact of this change. Specifically, I use actions to complete semantic release based releases and I don't know if this has an impact.

A more practical "this is what the change actually does for you" would be ideal (and appreciated). Assume I have the least knowledge...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants