Fix: make sure changes to maxFiles prop are reflected in behaviour #1026
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
October 28, 2020 14:00
…e reflected in behaviour
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 673d1b0344fd15ce9039af0eb38dd592b2618123-PR-1026
💛 - Coveralls |
1 similar comment
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 673d1b0344fd15ce9039af0eb38dd592b2618123-PR-1026
💛 - Coveralls |
morijenab
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2020
rolandjitsu
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2020
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 11.2.3 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Did you add tests for your changes?
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Fix for #1025
Adds
maxFilesas a dependency toonDropCbcallback, so that changes tomaxFilesparameter are reflected in the behaviour of that function.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information