Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip vtunnel readiness test #6880

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Nino-K
Copy link
Member

@Nino-K Nino-K commented May 14, 2024

The vtunnel process is not running when the network tunnel is enabled, therefore, we would not need to check for the process.

Related: #6422

@Nino-K Nino-K requested a review from mook-as May 14, 2024 17:39
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ export const defaultSettings = {
},
},
/** windows only: if set, use gvisor based network rather than host-resolver/dnsmasq. */
networkingTunnel: false,
networkingTunnel: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to make this change in this PR?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did that intentionally so that I could trigger the e2e test again. I know I have a PR that makes this change, but as you know that depends on the e2e tests to pass.

The vtunnel process is not running when the network tunnel is
enabled, therefore, we would not need to check for the process.

Signed-off-by: Nino Kodabande <nkodabande@suse.com>
@Nino-K Nino-K force-pushed the skip-vtunnel-check-network-tunnel branch from ee60361 to 971b4a2 Compare May 15, 2024 15:43
@mook-as mook-as merged commit 4bc88f9 into main May 15, 2024
23 checks passed
@mook-as mook-as deleted the skip-vtunnel-check-network-tunnel branch May 15, 2024 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants