fix(sec): upgrade lxml to 4.9.1 #1211
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I had a look into automated solutions. Two exist - also Python modules - but neither can handle the
|
|
Actually, yfinance doesn't use lxml anymore. Will remove it. |
|
Resolved by removing lxml - #1231 |
|
So removing lxml was wrong. Now restored and minimum version raised. Thanks @chncaption for alerting this problem. |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What happened？
There are 1 security vulnerabilities found in lxml 4.5.1
What did I do？
Upgrade lxml from 4.5.1 to 4.9.1 for vulnerability fix
What did you expect to happen？
Ideally, no insecure libs should be used.
The specification of the pull request
PR Specification from OSCS