cluster wide queue limit - main

[SimonUnge]

Proposed Changes

Same as #11196 but for main branch.

Types of Changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes issue #NNNN)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause an observable behavior change in existing systems)
• Documentation improvements (corrections, new content, etc)
• Cosmetic change (whitespace, formatting, etc)
• Build system and/or CI

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply.
You can also fill these out after creating the PR.
If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask on the mailing list.
We're here to help!
This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document
• I have signed the CA (see https://cla.pivotal.io/sign/rabbitmq)
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• All tests pass locally with my changes
• If relevant, I have added necessary documentation to https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-website
• If relevant, I have added this change to the first version(s) in release-notes that I expect to introduce it

Further Comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution
you did and what alternatives you considered, etc.

[SimonUnge]

Will rebase on #11222 once merged, to combine the logic a bit.

[michaelklishin]

@SimonUnge I have rebased this PR on top of main, please take a look. There was a conflict to resolve.

[SimonUnge]

@SimonUnge I have rebased this PR on top of main, please take a look. There was a conflict to resolve.

@michaelklishin Thanks, I fixed it up!

[SimonUnge]

@SimonUnge I have rebased this PR on top of main, please take a look. There was a conflict to resolve.

@michaelklishin Thanks, I fixed it up!

well, something is broker, looking into it...

[SimonUnge]

@SimonUnge I have rebased this PR on top of main, please take a look. There was a conflict to resolve.

@michaelklishin Thanks, I fixed it up!

well, something is broker, looking into it...

@michaelklishin ok now it looks good.