Bump kubernetes-client-bom from 6.1.1 to 6.2.0

[manusa]

Kubernetes Client 6.2.0 was just released: https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/releases/tag/v6.2.0

Just speeding up the dependabot process to see if CI reports any issue.

/cc @metacosm

[quarkus-bot]

Thanks for your pull request!

The title of your pull request does not follow our editorial rules. Could you have a look?

• title should preferably start with an uppercase character (if it makes sense!)

This message is automatically generated by a bot.

[gsmet]

Sorry you will have to rebase as I just merged a Dekorate bump. I tried to do it but I can't push to your fork because you have this weird org setup :).

[manusa]

No worries, Done :)

you have this weird org setup :).

Yes, I'm using this to better organize the repos in my profile. However, last month I realized (Ioannis shared this) that this won't work well for PRs since I can't let maintainers access my branches :( If someone knows of a better alternative, please share ;)

[geoand]

Seems like there are a lot of failures

[manusa]

I couldn't check all the errors, but the first one I saw is bad.

It looks like a misalignment (once again of Dekorate and Fabric8).

2022-10-20T12:15:45.7500626Z Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.BaseKubernetesListFluent io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.KubernetesListBuilder.addToItems(io.fabric8.kubernetes.api.model.HasMetadata[])'
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7501495Z 	at io.dekorate.ResourceRegistry.add(ResourceRegistry.java:113)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7502182Z 	at io.dekorate.AbstractKubernetesManifestGenerator.initializeRegistry(AbstractKubernetesManifestGenerator.java:330)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7503043Z 	at io.dekorate.kubernetes.manifest.KubernetesManifestGenerator.generate(KubernetesManifestGenerator.java:86)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7503856Z 	at io.dekorate.kubernetes.manifest.KubernetesManifestGenerator.generate(KubernetesManifestGenerator.java:59)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7504480Z 	at io.dekorate.Session.lambda$generate$16(Session.java:369)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7504950Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7505565Z 	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1625)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7506135Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$Head.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:762)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7506691Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:276)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7507323Z 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$ValueSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ConcurrentHashMap.java:3612)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7507963Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7508552Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7509146Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7509712Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7510264Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7510909Z 	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7511596Z 	at io.dekorate.Session.generate(Session.java:363)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7512016Z 	at io.dekorate.Session.lambda$generate$5(Session.java:292)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7512414Z 	at java.base/java.lang.Iterable.forEach(Iterable.java:75)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7512818Z 	at io.dekorate.Session.generate(Session.java:292)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7513202Z 	at io.dekorate.Session.close(Session.java:256)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7513743Z 	at io.quarkus.kubernetes.deployment.KubernetesProcessor.lambda$build$2(KubernetesProcessor.java:186)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7514322Z 	at java.base/java.util.Optional.ifPresent(Optional.java:178)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7514886Z 	at io.quarkus.kubernetes.deployment.KubernetesProcessor.build(KubernetesProcessor.java:139)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7515597Z 	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7516168Z 	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:577)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7516651Z 	at io.quarkus.deployment.ExtensionLoader$3.execute(ExtensionLoader.java:909)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7517143Z 	at io.quarkus.builder.BuildContext.run(BuildContext.java:281)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7517596Z 	at org.jboss.threads.ContextHandler$1.runWith(ContextHandler.java:18)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7518132Z 	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$Task.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:2449)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7518721Z 	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1478)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7519208Z 	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
2022-10-20T12:15:45.7519602Z 	at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:501)

The BaseKubernetesList class (internal) has been removed (fabric8io/kubernetes-client#4499 / fabric8io/kubernetes-client#3906) from the Client, and it looks like Dekorate's fluent types are expecting the class.

Just like last time, I think we'll only be able to merge this one if Dekorate is updated too.

@iocanel @metacosm

[manusa]

Just updated the PR with the latest Dekorate version that has an aligned version of the Fabric8 client 🤞

[geoand]

The k8s test failures are suspicious

[manusa]

😓 I'll check first thing tomorrow

[manusa]

The tests should be passing now.

Note that I realized we weren't doing any sort of Native image processing for the openshift-client extension.
I added a step to register the OpenShift client, its service providers, and the Java model types. I'm unsure how people were actually able to consume or make use of the OpenShift Java model types in native mode right now.

[quarkus-bot]

Failing Jobs - Building ca923e0

Status	Name	Step	Failures	Logs	Raw logs
⌛	JVM Tests - JDK 11	Build	⚠️ Check →	Logs	Raw logs
✔️	JVM Tests - JDK 17
🚫	JVM Tests - JDK 17 MacOS M1
✔️	JVM Tests - JDK 18

[geoand]

@metacosm any last comments?

[metacosm]

I think that's good for now… the big thing is to get 6.2 in there, we can adjust later on if needed.

[metacosm]

Thank you!

[geoand]

💪