Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Reactive Messaging version to 3.21.0 #28469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

ozangunalp
Copy link
Contributor

@ozangunalp ozangunalp commented Oct 10, 2022

Change jakarta rewrite versions smallrye-reactive-messaging -> 4.0.0, microprofile reactive messaging -> 3.0.0

Closes #28420

@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added area/dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file area/jakarta labels Oct 10, 2022
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Oct 10, 2022

jakarta rewrite version to 4.0.0
@ozangunalp ozangunalp marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2022 09:40
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Oct 12, 2022

Failing Jobs - Building bd8896e

Status Name Step Failures Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 11
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 17
JVM Tests - JDK 17 MacOS M1 Set up runner ⚠️ Check → Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 18

@gsmet gsmet merged commit fd0b6b7 into quarkusio:main Oct 13, 2022
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 2.14 - main milestone Oct 13, 2022
@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Oct 13, 2022

@ozangunalp @cescoffier is it something safe enough that we should backport it? Or does it also contain new features?

@ozangunalp
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it is ok to backport. There are no quarkus related features.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file area/jakarta kind/bugfix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Found unrecommended usage of private members (use package-private instead) in framework beans
3 participants