New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggest documenting that packages_distributions
won't work with editable installs
#402
Comments
A longer term alternative to simply documenting the limitation would be to standardise something equivalent to |
jpn--
added a commit
to jpn--/sharrow
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2022
editable mode is broken in 64, python/importlib_metadata#402
jpn--
added a commit
to camsys/activitysim
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2022
jpn--
added a commit
to ActivitySim/sharrow
that referenced
this issue
Aug 25, 2022
* do not drop dims when analog is missing * fix shared memory for sparse arrays * flows work with numba jit disabled * fix error in looking up from empty sparse rows * fix reverse in sparse * allow None in attrs * import .dataset by default * limit to setuptools<64 editable mode is broken in 64, python/importlib_metadata#402 * fix install info in docs addresses #25 * re-loop aster for mixed spacenames, fix np.clip * faster dataset from dataframe * update install reqs * add 3.10 to test matrix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As discussed in pypa/packaging-problems#609, PEP 660 editable wheels which are generated by backends other than setuptools will not contain a
top_level.txt
and with theRECORD
only listing e.g. the pth file with an entry to the original package directory,packages_distributions
will not be able to reconcile editable packages with their corresponding distributions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: