New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use importlib.metadata from the standard library on Python 3.10 #772
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Remove dependency on external importlib_metadata on Python 3.10. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to do the version check in one place. Given that it's already being done in
twine/__init__.py
, I think this could be something like:That feels a little exotic, but so does using
importlib_metadata
in the first place (even though it was for a good reason, IIRC).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While that's DRY, it also will add an implicit dependency on that import in
twine/__init__.py
and every import in that file slows down the start-up speed of twine. Users often complain of how long CLIs take to start and so I'd rather not start a pattern of importing packages that may have been imported in that file because people tend to glom onto that and re-use that pattern needlessly.If we want somewhere to centralize imports like this, I'd suggest a separate module altogether, e.g.,
twine/_compat.py
where we have this logic and thentwine/__init__.py
can use that and so can other placesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since
__init__
already importsimportlib.metadata
for its own use, the argument is only that people might generalize it too much, right?Should I do this but add a comment explaining it's not a general pattern?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the explanation, @sigmavirus24. I like the
twine/_compat.py
soluton.However, after reading through PR that added standardized on
importlib_metadata
, specifically #732 (comment), I'm still hesitant to accept the complexity this introduces for what feels like a small benefit.@encukou What do you think about closing this PR, and opening an issue so that references it, so that we can come back to it after the release of 3.10 and/or 3.11?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're free to do that, of course!