New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix plausible loading #909
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great to me! Thanks for the fix. I believe that the **kwargs
pattern is a nice way to allow for -
in Python arguments so it seems fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops I spoke too soon! can you please get the tests passing? :-)
Well, OK. I adjusted the unit tests accordingly ;) .. They run locally and pre-commit inclusive Having no-valid identifiers as keys in |
I accidentally added |
Yes please don't modify package-lock.json unless it is relevant to this PR. I tried deleting it in the files but it looks like we just need to revert it to whatever is on It looks good to me assuming that tests are happy + package lock is reverted. |
Co-authored-by: Chris Holdgraf <choldgraf@gmail.com>
I think that the tests were happy (I cannot trigger them) and I somehow managed to get the file reverted (that took much longer than it should have). I rebased on main too along the process. @choldgraf , please let me know if there are any more issues |
Gentle reminder :-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me - thanks!
Fixes #905
However, tags are given to the
add_js_file
in the form of keyword arguments. Thedata-domain
has a minus in it which disqualifies it as a python identifier, yet the fix works. I would have expected that python complains so I don't know if this is an acceptable solution. Comments?