Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Pydantic version to 1.9.0 #3432

Closed

Conversation

christianbundy
Copy link
Contributor

Change Summary

Problem: There's been lots of work done on Pydantic since 1.8.2, and
there hasn't been a release cut for 1.9.0 yet.

Solution: Try to reduce maintainer load by following the '1.8.2 prep'
example to help with the 1.9.0 release.

Related issue number

See-also: #2780

Checklist

  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Tests pass on CI and coverage remains at 100%
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
  • changes/<pull request or issue id>-<github username>.md file added describing change
    (see changes/README.md for details)
  • My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

Problem: There's been lots of work done on Pydantic since 1.8.2, and
there hasn't been a release cut for 1.9.0 yet.

Solution: Try to reduce maintainer load by following the '1.8.2 prep'
example to help with the 1.9.0 release.

See-also: pydantic#2780
@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Member

Hi, I know I need to make a new release, but I don't think this helps. I need to go through a lot of PRs merge then, then make a new release.

Pydantic really is on my conscience, I know I need to find some time to fix it.

@christianbundy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the quick response — sorry if this isn’t helpful, is there anything I can do to help? Most of my open source maintenance has been in the JS/TS ecosystem but I have lots of empathy for how much time + energy releases take.

@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Member

Honestly, probably the most useful thing is to review open PRs you think look important and say:

I've tried this and it works well

Or

I've tried this and the following things don't work...

@christianbundy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would you be open to releasing what we have now as an alpha or similar? I've tried using master and the only bug I hit was resolved by #3324.

For context, my team is blocked from upgrading to 3.9.8 until we can upgrade Pydantic due to #3423.

@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Member

I'm working on it, see this tweet

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants