refactor #206
refactor #206
Conversation
WalkthroughThe codebase has undergone a refactoring phase with a focus on enhancing the web scraping capabilities and streamlining text processing functions. Parsing utilities have been introduced for XML content, and the text manipulation logic has been significantly overhauled. Additionally, there's been a reorganization of imports and type annotations, with the introduction of sequence-related functionalities and minor adjustments in test imports. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (2)
- poetry.lock
- pyproject.toml
Files selected for processing (12)
- public_law/html.py (1 hunks)
- public_law/models/glossary.py (1 hunks)
- public_law/parsers/aus/dv_glossary.py (2 hunks)
- public_law/parsers/irl/courts_glossary.py (2 hunks)
- public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs.py (2 hunks)
- public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs_articles.py (1 hunks)
- public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs_divisions.py (1 hunks)
- public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs_sections.py (1 hunks)
- public_law/parsers/usa/uscis_glossary.py (2 hunks)
- public_law/seq.py (1 hunks)
- public_law/text.py (3 hunks)
- tests/public_law/parsers/aus/dv_glossary_test.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs_sections.py
- tests/public_law/parsers/aus/dv_glossary_test.py
Additional comments: 21
public_law/seq.py (1)
- 9-12: The implementation of the
getfunction is correct and the use ofcurryfromtoolz.functoolzis appropriate for creating a curried version of the function. This enhances the functional programming capabilities of the code.public_law/html.py (3)
10-11: The
node_namefunction is simple and correctly retrieves the name of a node using XPath. This is a common operation when dealing with XML/HTML parsing.13-14: The
just_textfunction is also correct, providing a way to extract text content from a node. It's a utility that will likely be used frequently in the context of web scraping.16-36: The
xpathfunction is well-implemented with a comprehensive docstring. It correctly appends/text()to the selector to extract text content and raises aParseExceptionif no match is found. The use of pattern matching in Python is a modern feature that enhances readability and maintainability.public_law/models/glossary.py (1)
- 1-4: The import statements are organized correctly, and the order of type annotations is consistent with common Python conventions, which typically list
AnyandCallablebefore other types.public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs.py (3)
19-22: The
parse_title_bangfunction correctly uses pattern matching to raise aParseExceptionif the title cannot be parsed. This is a good use of Python's pattern matching to handle control flow based on the result ofparse_title.29-42: The
parse_titlefunction is refactored to usetext.pipefor a functional and readable approach to text processing. The use ofcurryon thexpathfunction fromhtmlis noted, and the type ignore comments should be addressed as mentioned earlier.65-67: The
_source_urlfunction is correctly renamed with a leading underscore to indicate it's intended for internal use. The explicit return type annotationtext.URLis a good practice for clarity and type checking.public_law/parsers/aus/dv_glossary.py (2)
16-16: The
parse_glossaryfunction's logic remains unchanged, and the use oftext.pipeis consistent with the functional programming style adopted in other parts of the codebase.51-54: The
text.pipefunction is used correctly to clean up the phrase by stripping trailing characters. This is a good example of functional composition in Python.public_law/parsers/irl/courts_glossary.py (2)
52-60: The
cleanup_definitionfunction is refactored to use thetextmodule functions, which is consistent with the functional programming style and improves readability.64-67: The
cleanup_phrasefunction is also refactored to usetext.pipe, which is a good practice for maintaining a consistent coding style across the project.public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs_divisions.py (1)
- 8-11: The import of the
just_textfunction frompublic_law.htmlis correct and replaces the previous import frompublic_law.selector_util. This change should be verified to ensure that the behavior ofjust_textremains consistent with the expectations of the parser functions.public_law/parsers/usa/uscis_glossary.py (1)
- 68-71: The
cleanup_phrasefunction is refactored to usetext.pipe, which is consistent with the functional programming style and improves the readability of the code.public_law/parsers/usa/colorado/crs_articles.py (1)
- 11-11: The import of the
node_namefunction frompublic_law.htmlis correct and replaces the previous import frompublic_law.selector_util. This change should be verified to ensure that the behavior ofnode_nameremains consistent with the expectations of the parser functions.Verification successful
To verify the consistency of the
node_namefunction's behavior after changing its import source, we need to compare the implementation in bothpublic_law.htmlandpublic_law.selector_util. Let's create a script to extract the definition ofnode_namefrom both modules.
Let's correct the script to search for the
node_namefunction definition in the entire codebase without using the--includeflag.
Given the lack of results from
ast-grep, let's usergto search for thenode_namefunction definition in the codebase.
The search results indicate that the
node_namefunction is defined inpublic_law/html.py. However, there are no results frompublic_law/selector_util.py, which suggests that the function may no longer exist in that module or it was never there. Given this information, the change in import source topublic_law.htmlseems justified, as the function is present there.Since we do not have evidence of the
node_namefunction inpublic_law/selector_util.py, we cannot compare the implementations to ensure they are consistent. Therefore, based on the available information, the review comment is correct in approving the change of the import source fornode_nametopublic_law.html.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the behavior of `node_name` from `public_law.html` is consistent with its previous implementation. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'from public_law.html import node_name'Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the definition of `node_name` from both public_law.html and public_law.selector_util ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def node_name($_): $$$' --include 'public_law/html.py' ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def node_name($_): $$$' --include 'public_law/selector_util.py'Length of output: 592
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `node_name` in the entire codebase ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def node_name($_): $$$'Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for the definition of `node_name` in the codebase rg 'def node_name\('Length of output: 86
public_law/text.py (6)
11-12: The addition of
toolzandfunctoolzimports suggests the introduction of functional programming utilities. Ensure that these new dependencies are properly documented and that their versions are compatible with the project's requirements.208-214: The
pipefunction is introduced as a wrapper aroundfunctoolz.pipewith a cast toNonemptyString. Ensure that the casting toNonemptyStringis always valid, as thepipefunction could potentially return an empty string, which would violate the contract ofNonemptyString.216-216: The
splitfunction is introduced usingcurryandflipfromtoolz.functoolz. Verify that the currying behavior is well-understood and documented, as it changes the order of arguments and could lead to confusion if not used correctly.220-220: The
lstripfunction is introduced usingcurryandflip. As withsplit, ensure that the currying behavior is documented and that there are tests to verify its correct behavior.224-224: The
rstripfunction is introduced usingcurryandflip. Similar tosplitandlstrip, verify that the currying behavior is documented and tested.227-246: The
titleizefunction has been redefined. It now includes a special case for Roman numerals and uses thetitlecaselibrary. Ensure that the special case for Roman numerals is covered by unit tests and that the behavior oftitlecasewith thetext.lower()call is as expected. The use of# type: ignoreshould be justified and minimized; if possible, replace it with proper type annotations.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Style
Tests