Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Named RPC call implementaion with out and table-valued params support #328

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andrvo
Copy link

@andrvo andrvo commented Jan 31, 2024

SUBJ. No changes to existing code behavior, no changes to existing public API, just some extras to call stored procedures or UDFs directly.

There are also few minor fixes for test build issues caused by recent time/chrono deprecated methods use.

Some test issues still persist:

  • all SQL Server 2022 tests failing due to connectivity errors
  • macos tests show build issues

Both are not related to the changes included in this PR, might be something caused by other dependencies updates.

* named proc/func rpc call skeleton

* out param testing

* more practial output params accessor

* TVP type info skel draft

* TVP type info metadata out

* RpcValue introduced

* TVP public binding, quick-n-dirty concept

* TVP public binding, simplified

* tvp debug version, pre-alfa

* TVP working concept proof, limited set of types supported for pure debug purposes

* TVP fixed len type mapping as per 2.2.5.5.5.3

* minor refactoring and dbg! cleanup

* exec_query added with minor overall refactoring; filter-stream introduced

* CommandStream introduced, FilterStream removed as no longer needed. Alfa-ready

* public API optimized, query_result accessors added for CommandResult

* bind_table goes behind "tds73" feature

* Derive macro for TableValueRow introduced

* tvp macro tidy up, basic docs added for Command and CommandResult

* CommandStream few more accessors/converters for CommandItem, basic docs for CommandStream
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant