Avoid copying Sexps that are too large

[presidentbeef]

Addresses #1816, #1546, maybe others.

I avoided doing this in the past, because checking the size of the s-exps all the time seemed expensive. However, based on some testing, it has little to no impact on scan times. Caching the s-sexp mass doesn't make much of a difference.

On the other hand, it resolves some performance issues and doesn't appear to reduce useful results.

If needed, the mass limit can be adjusted by using a config file. Not adding a command line option at this time.

[dryrunsecurity]

Contextual Security Analysis

As DryRun Security performs checks, we’ll summarize them here. You can always dive into the detailed results in the section below for checks.

Status	DryRun Security Check
✅	AI-powered Sensitive Function Check
✅	Configured Sensitive Files Check
✅	AI-powered Sensitive Files Check

Chat with your AI-powered Security Buddy by typing @dryrunsecurity followed by your question into a comment.
Example: @dryrunsecurity What are common security issues with web application cookies?

Install and configure more repositories at DryRun Security