Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use sqlite3 instead of symlinks for managing repositories #190

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

asottile
Copy link
Member

Necessary for #159

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.04%) when pulling 2be849b on sqlite_instead_of_symlinks into e6add0e on master.

@asottile
Copy link
Member Author

Note: as written, an upgrade to this version will not break, but will cause the user to need to reinstall all hooks. I think this is ok? Could write an upgrade pathway as well... hmmm...

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling a9a14ce on sqlite_instead_of_symlinks into e6add0e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.04%) when pulling 806939b on sqlite_instead_of_symlinks into e6add0e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 8dd4ee3 on sqlite_instead_of_symlinks into e6add0e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling fee5444 on sqlite_instead_of_symlinks into e6add0e on master.

@asottile
Copy link
Member Author

#196 includes this

@asottile asottile closed this Feb 23, 2015
@asottile asottile deleted the sqlite_instead_of_symlinks branch February 23, 2015 01:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants