Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency es6-promise to v4 #12

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented May 9, 2021

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
es6-promise ^2.0.1 -> ^4.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

stefanpenner/es6-promise (es6-promise)

v4.2.8

Compare Source

v4.2.7

Compare Source

v4.2.6

Compare Source

v4.2.5

Compare Source

  • remove old try/catch performance hacks, modern runtimes do not require these tricks

v4.2.4

Compare Source

v4.2.3

Compare Source

  • Cleanup testem related build configuration
  • Use prepublishOnly instead of prepublish (thanks @​rhysd)
  • Add Node.js 9, 8 to testing matrix
  • drop now unused s3 deployment files
  • internal cleanup (thanks to @​bekzod, @​mariusschulz)
  • Fixup Changelog

v4.2.2

Compare Source

  • Ensure PROMISE_ID works correctly
  • internal cleanup (thanks yo @​mariusschulz)

v4.2.1

Compare Source

  • drop bower support

v4.2.0

Compare Source

  • drop dist from git repo
  • add Promise.prototype.finally
  • update various build related dependencies
  • add CDN links

v4.1.1

Compare Source

v4.1.0

Compare Source

  • [BUGFIX] Fix memory leak [#​269]
  • [BUGFIX] Auto Bundles within an AMD Environment [#​263]

v4.0.5

Compare Source

  • fix require('es6-promise/auto') for Node < 4

v4.0.4

Compare Source

v4.0.3

Compare Source

  • fix Readme links

v4.0.2

Compare Source

  • fix require('es6-promise/auto');

v4.0.1

Compare Source

v4.0.0

Compare Source

  • no longer polyfill automatically, if needed one can still invoke
    require('es6-promise/auto') directly.

v3.3.1

Compare Source

  • fix links in readme

v3.3.0

Compare Source

  • support polyfil on WebMAF (playstation env)
  • fix tampering related bug global constructor was referenced by mistake.
  • provide TS Typings
  • increase compatibliity with sinon.useFakeTimers();
  • update build tools (use rollup)
  • directly export promise;

v3.2.1

Compare Source

  • fix race tampering issue
  • use eslint
  • fix Promise.all tampering
  • remove unused code
  • fix issues with NWJS/electron

v3.1.2

Compare Source

  • fix node detection issues with NWJS/electron

v3.0.2

Compare Source

  • correctly bump both bower and package.json versions

v3.0.1

Compare Source

  • no longer include dist/test in npm releases

v3.0.0

Compare Source

  • use nextTick() instead of setImmediate() to schedule microtasks with node 0.10. Later versions of
    nodes are not affected as they were already using nextTick(). Note that using nextTick() might
    trigger a depreciation warning on 0.10 as descrhttps://github.com/cujojs/when/issues/410sues/410.
    The reason why nextTick() is preferred is that is setImmediate() would schedule a macrotask
    instead of a microtask and might result in a different scheduling.
    If needed you can revert to the former behavior as follow:

    var Promise = require('es6-promise').Promise;
    Promise._setScheduler(setImmediate);


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/es6-promise-4.x branch from 99785d9 to 2fc4496 Compare May 15, 2021 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants