[java] Fix #3697 - lookahead error in concise resource spec

[oowekyala]

Describe the PR

The LOOKAHEAD(2) was not enough as f.in may begin a qualified type of a local var-ish resource, or a concise resource.

Related issues

• Fixes [java] Parsing error with try-with-resources and qualified resource #3697

Ready?

• Added unit tests for fixed bug/feature
• Passing all unit tests
• Complete build ./mvnw clean verify passes (checked automatically by github actions)
• Added (in-code) documentation (if needed)

[pmd-test]

	1 Message
📖	This changeset changes 87 violations, introduces 1 new violations, 0 new errors and 0 new configuration errors, removes 0 violations, 0 errors and 0 configuration errors. Full report

Generated by 🚫 Danger

[adangel]

Thanks!

[adangel]

I wonder, what the problem is with the file AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java during regression testing - this almost always shows up as changed. The baseline somehow seems to use a changed version of this file?? I think only the line numbers are different....