Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 10626: Do type checks on pass by reference parameters for non-builtin functions and methods. #2939

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ljmaskey
Copy link
Contributor

Do type checks on pass by reference parameters for non-builtin functions and methods.

Initially, all pass by reference parameters were skipped for type checking. This change continues to skip those checks for builtin PHP methods, but does check parameters for userland methods.

…ons and methods.

Initially, all pass by reference parameters were skipped for type checking. This change continues to skip
those checks for builtin PHP methods, but does check parameters for userland methods.
@phpstan-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

You've opened the pull request against the latest branch 1.11.x. If your code is relevant on 1.10.x and you want it to be released sooner, please rebase your pull request and change its target to 1.10.x.

@ondrejmirtes
Copy link
Member

Yes, please write a regression test for 8296 😊 Thanks.

@ljmaskey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just to be a pain, I've added the test for 8296, but opened the PR against 1.10.x instead. That's at #2941. If it makes sense to keep this one open, I can add the additional test to this PR, or we can just close this one and go with the new one against 1.10.x.

@ondrejmirtes
Copy link
Member

Hey, just a tip - you don't need to close a PR when you just want to change the base. The correct thing to do here would be to change the base in the GitHub UI to 1.10.x, rebase your commits locally on top of 1.10.x (git rebase --onto is a great way to do it) and force-push to the same branch. But you already opened a new PR so I'm going to close this one :)

@ljmaskey ljmaskey deleted the bug-10626 branch February 24, 2024 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants