Convert for..of object loop to for..in range loop in client.coffee #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Maybe report this issue to Meteor first? It looks like unintended side effect of the change there? Or there might be some simpler fix? I do not understand why would this valid code fail here? |
|
@mitar I'm having a hard time understanding this as well. Do you have time to check whether this issue happens for you as well with Meteor 1.8.2-beta.18? |
|
I can confirm it does not work for me with |
|
Package just had to be republished with latest Meteor. A new version is now available as 0.5.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since this PR to Meteor 1.8.2 meteor/meteor#10596, the client gives an error in client.coffee "ReferenceError: meteorBabelHelpers is not defined". There is more relevant discussion here for a similar issue: meteor/meteor#7184
This PR fixes the problem, but perhaps there is a more correct solution.