Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Use old url_name behavior in route decorators (encode#5915)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* Wrap action decorator for old url_name behavior
  • Loading branch information
Ryan P Kilby authored and Pierre Chiquet committed Mar 24, 2020
1 parent e421fa0 commit cddc2b9
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 30 additions and 4 deletions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions docs/topics/release-notes.md
Expand Up @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ You can determine your currently installed version using `pip show`:
* Merged `list_route` and `detail_route` into a single `action` decorator.
* Get all extra actions on a `ViewSet` with `.get_extra_actions()`.
* Extra actions now set the `url_name` and `url_path` on the decorated method.
* `url_name` is now based on the function name, instead of the `url_path`,
as the path is not always suitable (e.g., capturing arguments in the path).
* Enable action url reversing through `.reverse_action()` method (added in 3.7.4)
* Example reverse call: `self.reverse_action(self.custom_action.url_name)`
* Add `detail` initkwarg to indicate if the current action is operating on a
Expand All @@ -97,6 +99,8 @@ You can determine your currently installed version using `pip show`:
* Deprecated `list_route` & `detail_route` in favor of `action` decorator with `detail` boolean.
* Deprecated dynamic list/detail route variants in favor of `DynamicRoute` with `detail` boolean.
* Refactored the router's dynamic route generation.
* `list_route` and `detail_route` maintain the old behavior of `url_name`,
basing it on the `url_path` instead of the function name.

* Fix formatting of the 3.7.4 release note [#5704][gh5704]
* Docs: Update DRF Writable Nested Serializers references [#5711][gh5711]
Expand Down
20 changes: 16 additions & 4 deletions rest_framework/decorators.py
Expand Up @@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ def action(methods=None, detail=None, url_path=None, url_name=None, **kwargs):
def decorator(func):
func.bind_to_methods = methods
func.detail = detail
func.url_path = url_path or func.__name__
func.url_name = url_name or func.__name__.replace('_', '-')
func.url_path = url_path if url_path else func.__name__
func.url_name = url_name if url_name else func.__name__.replace('_', '-')
func.kwargs = kwargs
return func
return decorator
Expand All @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ def detail_route(methods=None, **kwargs):
"`action`, which accepts a `detail` bool. Use `@action(detail=True)` instead.",
PendingDeprecationWarning, stacklevel=2
)
return action(methods, detail=True, **kwargs)

def decorator(func):
func = action(methods, detail=True, **kwargs)(func)
if 'url_name' not in kwargs:
func.url_name = func.url_path.replace('_', '-')
return func
return decorator


def list_route(methods=None, **kwargs):
Expand All @@ -175,4 +181,10 @@ def list_route(methods=None, **kwargs):
"`action`, which accepts a `detail` bool. Use `@action(detail=False)` instead.",
PendingDeprecationWarning, stacklevel=2
)
return action(methods, detail=False, **kwargs)

def decorator(func):
func = action(methods, detail=False, **kwargs)(func)
if 'url_name' not in kwargs:
func.url_name = func.url_path.replace('_', '-')
return func
return decorator
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions tests/test_decorators.py
Expand Up @@ -215,3 +215,13 @@ def view(request):
"3.10 in favor of `action`, which accepts a `detail` bool. Use "
"`@action(detail=False)` instead."
)

def test_route_url_name_from_path(self):
# pre-3.8 behavior was to base the `url_name` off of the `url_path`
with pytest.warns(PendingDeprecationWarning):
@list_route(url_path='foo_bar')
def view(request):
pass

assert view.url_path == 'foo_bar'
assert view.url_name == 'foo-bar'

0 comments on commit cddc2b9

Please sign in to comment.