Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump node.js from v14.21.3 to v18.15.0 #3608

Closed

Conversation

ananzh
Copy link
Member

@ananzh ananzh commented Mar 14, 2023

Description

Revert "add node fiber to improve performance (#2319)"
Revert "[CVE-2022-25758] Use dart-sass instead of node-sass (#2054)"
Revert back to use node-sass and bump to 8.0.0
Change lmdb-store to lmdb
Bump node.js to 18 and fix errors

Issues Resolved

#3601

Check List

  • All tests pass
    • yarn test:jest
    • yarn test:jest_integration
    • yarn test:ftr
  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • Update CHANGELOG.md
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

@ananzh ananzh self-assigned this Mar 14, 2023
@ananzh ananzh requested a review from a team as a code owner March 14, 2023 16:11
@ananzh ananzh changed the title Bump node.js from v14.20.1 to v18.12.0 Bump node.js from v14.20.1 to v18.15.0 Mar 14, 2023
@ananzh ananzh changed the title Bump node.js from v14.20.1 to v18.15.0 Bump node.js from v14.21.3 to v18.15.0 Mar 14, 2023
@ananzh ananzh force-pushed the bump-nodejs-18-node-sass branch 6 times, most recently from 8e16947 to d0f49c6 Compare March 15, 2023 20:31
@ananzh ananzh added the Skip-Changelog PRs that are too trivial to warrant a changelog or release notes entry label Mar 15, 2023
@ananzh ananzh force-pushed the bump-nodejs-18-node-sass branch 2 times, most recently from e79062d to daedc87 Compare March 16, 2023 18:29
@ananzh ananzh marked this pull request as draft April 11, 2023 17:35
Revert "add node fiber to improve performance (opensearch-project#2319)"
Revert "[CVE-2022-25758] Use dart-sass instead of node-sass (opensearch-project#2054)"
Revert back to use node-sass and bump to 8.0.0
Change lmdb-store to lmdb
Bump node.js to 18 and fix errors

Issue Resolved:
opensearch-project#3601

Signed-off-by: Anan Zhuang <ananzh@amazon.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3608 (ca60f16) into main (9d27023) will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 71.42%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3608      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.44%   66.29%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files        3227     3227              
  Lines       62051    62064      +13     
  Branches     9593     9599       +6     
==========================================
- Hits        41227    41143      -84     
- Misses      18523    18602      +79     
- Partials     2301     2319      +18     
Flag Coverage Δ
Linux 66.29% <71.42%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
Windows ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/osd-dev-utils/src/proc_runner/proc.ts 6.52% <0.00%> (ø)
...ages/osd-optimizer/src/optimizer/observe_worker.ts 16.36% <ø> (ø)
src/core/server/status/status_service.ts 78.94% <ø> (ø)
...core/server/plugins/discovery/plugins_discovery.ts 80.95% <33.33%> (-4.05%) ⬇️
src/core/server/bootstrap.ts 2.85% <50.00%> (+2.85%) ⬆️
...ection/public/components/opt_in_example_flyout.tsx 65.00% <62.50%> (-1.67%) ⬇️
...es/osd-optimizer/src/optimizer/optimizer_config.ts 74.57% <83.33%> (-20.07%) ⬇️
packages/osd-optimizer/src/node/cache.ts 55.00% <88.88%> (+1.05%) ⬆️
src/core/server/http/router/request.ts 98.07% <100.00%> (ø)
...server/plugins/discovery/plugin_manifest_parser.ts 83.05% <100.00%> (+0.29%) ⬆️
... and 1 more

... and 27 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@joshuarrrr
Copy link
Member

@ananzh Should this PR be closed in favor of #4071? In any case, I'll remove the 2.8.0 label for now.

@joshuarrrr joshuarrrr removed the v2.8.0 label May 25, 2023
@ananzh
Copy link
Member Author

ananzh commented May 26, 2023

@joshuarrrr thanks. since we decides to use patched webpack in #4071, close this PR.

@ananzh ananzh closed this May 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip-Changelog PRs that are too trivial to warrant a changelog or release notes entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants