-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8332297: annotation processor that generates records sometimes fails due to NPE in javac #19288
8332297: annotation processor that generates records sometimes fails due to NPE in javac #19288
Conversation
…due to NPE in javac
👋 Welcome back vromero! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@vicente-romero-oracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 95 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@vicente-romero-oracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks reasonable to me.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 9bfae88.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@vicente-romero-oracle Pushed as commit 9bfae88. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This bug is a bit particular regarding how to reproduce it. Having:
and:
and:
do:
so the first time file ConfRecord.java is produced by the annotation processor, and later compiled by javac so all the information is gathered from a source file. The second time, ConfRecord.class is found, loaded and symbol for ConfRecord is completed from there. As the class file doesn't store the position of the record components in the original source file, method
ClassSymbol::findRecordComponentToRemove
won't find a match when trying to remove a record component and then two record components with the same name gets added to the record, currently we try to match on name and position. But for one of them there won't be an accessor assigned. We remove record components when dealing with annotation processors to make sure that later on we are propagating the correct annotations to other record elements the annotations could be applicable to.The proposal here is to match only on name if the position is
-1
which is the default for all record components when the record class has been loaded from a class file.TIA
Progress
Warning
8332297: annotation processor that generates records sometimes fails due to NPE in javac
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19288/head:pull/19288
$ git checkout pull/19288
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19288
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19288/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19288
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19288
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19288.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment