Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8332297: annotation processor that generates records sometimes fails due to NPE in javac #19288

Conversation

vicente-romero-oracle
Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle commented May 17, 2024

This bug is a bit particular regarding how to reproduce it. Having:

import java.lang.annotation.*;
public @interface RecordBuilder {}

interface Conf {
    int maxConcurrency( );
}

and:

import java.lang.annotation.*;
public @interface RecordBuilder {
}

and:

import java.util.*;
import java.io.*;

import javax.annotation.processing.*;
import javax.lang.model.element.TypeElement;
import javax.tools.StandardLocation;

@SupportedAnnotationTypes("*")
public class SimplestAP extends AbstractProcessor {
    @Override
    public boolean process(Set<? extends TypeElement> annotations, RoundEnvironment roundEnv) {
        if (roundEnv.processingOver()) {
            try (Writer w = processingEnv.getFiler().createSourceFile("ConfRecord").openWriter()) {
                w.append("@RecordBuilder public record ConfRecord(int maxConcurrency) implements Conf {}");
            } catch (IOException ex) {
                throw new IllegalStateException(ex);
            }
        }
        return true;
    }
}

do:

javac SimplestAP.java

javac -processor SimplestAP Conf.java //compiles fine
javac -processor SimplestAP Conf.java // fails with:
warning: No SupportedSourceVersion annotation found on SimplestAP, returning RELEASE_6.
warning: Supported source version 'RELEASE_6' from annotation processor 'SimplestAP' less than -source '23'
warning: File for type 'ConfRecord' created in the last round will not be subject to annotation processing.
3 warnings
An exception has occurred in the compiler (23-internal). Please file a bug against the Java compiler via the Java bug reporting page (https://bugreport.java.com/) after checking the Bug Database (https://bugs.java.com/) for duplicates. Include your program, the following diagnostic, and the parameters passed to the Java compiler in your report. Thank you.
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$MethodSymbol.flags()" because "rc.accessor" is null
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.lambda$generateMandatedAccessors$6(Lower.java:2403)
at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:196)
at java.base/java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Iterator.java:133)
at java.base/java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:1939)
at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:570)
at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:560)
at java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:921)
at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:265)
at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:727)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.generateMandatedAccessors(Lower.java:2410)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.visitRecordDef(Lower.java:2607)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.visitClassDef(Lower.java:2300)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.tree.JCTree$JCClassDecl.accept(JCTree.java:855)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.tree.TreeTranslator.translate(TreeTranslator.java:58)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.translate(Lower.java:2192)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.translate(Lower.java:2211)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.translateTopLevelClass(Lower.java:4475)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.desugar(JavaCompiler.java:1647)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.desugar(JavaCompiler.java:1467)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:977)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.compile(Main.java:319)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.main.Main.compile(Main.java:178)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile(Main.java:66)
at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.Main.main(Main.java:52)

so the first time file ConfRecord.java is produced by the annotation processor, and later compiled by javac so all the information is gathered from a source file. The second time, ConfRecord.class is found, loaded and symbol for ConfRecord is completed from there. As the class file doesn't store the position of the record components in the original source file, method ClassSymbol::findRecordComponentToRemove won't find a match when trying to remove a record component and then two record components with the same name gets added to the record, currently we try to match on name and position. But for one of them there won't be an accessor assigned. We remove record components when dealing with annotation processors to make sure that later on we are propagating the correct annotations to other record elements the annotations could be applicable to.

The proposal here is to match only on name if the position is -1 which is the default for all record components when the record class has been loaded from a class file.

TIA


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Warning

 ⚠️ Found leading lowercase letter in issue title for 8332297: annotation processor that generates records sometimes fails due to NPE in javac

Issue

  • JDK-8332297: annotation processor that generates records sometimes fails due to NPE in javac (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19288/head:pull/19288
$ git checkout pull/19288

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19288
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19288/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19288

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19288

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19288.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 17, 2024

👋 Welcome back vromero! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2024

@vicente-romero-oracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8332297: annotation processor that generates records sometimes fails due to NPE in javac

Reviewed-by: jlahoda

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 95 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e529101: 8332473: ubsan: growableArray.hpp:290:10: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null
  • 414a7fd: 8311175: Move BufWriter::asByteBuffer to BufWriterImpl
  • 451cc23: 8332486: ClassFile API ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with label metadata
  • 5f2b8d0: 8332448: Make SpaceMangler inherit AllStatic
  • 8a49d47: 8332462: ubsan: c1_ValueStack.hpp:229:49: runtime error: load of value 171, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
  • ce99198: 8332181: Deprecate for removal the MulticastSocket.send(DatagramPacket, byte) and setTTL/getTTL methods on DatagramSocketImpl and MulticastSocket
  • f5ab7df: 8332494: java/util/zip/EntryCount64k.java failing with java.lang.RuntimeException: '\A\Z' missing from stderr
  • 9f77793: 8332495: java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock2.java fails with AssertionError: Some tests failed
  • fb45bab: 8075917: The regression-swing case failed as the text on label is not painted red with the GTK L&F
  • 6e80512: 8332545: Fix handling of HTML5 entities in Markdown comments
  • ... and 85 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1b476f52ba85f9ceaabe785d36cb07df831fd0e8...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2024

@vicente-romero-oracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label May 17, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 17, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@lahodaj lahodaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 21, 2024
@vicente-romero-oracle
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 21, 2024

Going to push as commit 9bfae88.
Since your change was applied there have been 97 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4e169d1: 8332401: G1: TestFromCardCacheIndex.java with -XX:GCCardSizeInBytes=128 triggers underflow assertion
  • 7ffc999: 8332498: [aarch64, x86] improving OpToAssembly output for partialSubtypeCheckConstSuper Instruct
  • e529101: 8332473: ubsan: growableArray.hpp:290:10: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null
  • 414a7fd: 8311175: Move BufWriter::asByteBuffer to BufWriterImpl
  • 451cc23: 8332486: ClassFile API ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with label metadata
  • 5f2b8d0: 8332448: Make SpaceMangler inherit AllStatic
  • 8a49d47: 8332462: ubsan: c1_ValueStack.hpp:229:49: runtime error: load of value 171, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
  • ce99198: 8332181: Deprecate for removal the MulticastSocket.send(DatagramPacket, byte) and setTTL/getTTL methods on DatagramSocketImpl and MulticastSocket
  • f5ab7df: 8332494: java/util/zip/EntryCount64k.java failing with java.lang.RuntimeException: '\A\Z' missing from stderr
  • 9f77793: 8332495: java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock2.java fails with AssertionError: Some tests failed
  • ... and 87 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1b476f52ba85f9ceaabe785d36cb07df831fd0e8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 21, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 21, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 21, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 21, 2024

@vicente-romero-oracle Pushed as commit 9bfae88.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle deleted the JDK-8332297 branch May 21, 2024 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants