fix: Data too long for column 'resource_id'

[shadinaif]

when the course id is a little bit long, the lti xblock id becomes too long for resource_id to handle

To reproduce:

• Create a course with long ID. For example: course-v1:Public+TEST_IT_01+TEST_IT_01_Dec_2023
• Add lti_consumer in Advanced settings for the course
• Try to add an LTI component in the course with version 1.3
• The unit crashes
  

we tried that on the latest https://sandbox.openedx.org

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @shadinaif! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[shadinaif]

For your review @OmarIthawi, please

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.85%. Comparing base (83fa9e0) to head (c5851e6).

❗ Current head c5851e6 differs from pull request most recent head f6fbae4. Consider uploading reports for the commit f6fbae4 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #435      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.83%   97.85%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          77       78       +1     
  Lines        6710     6709       -1     
==========================================
  Hits         6565     6565              
+ Misses        145      144       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	97.85% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[OmarIthawi]

Thanks @shadinaif please update the following:

• version: https://github.com/openedx/xblock-lti-consumer/blob/master/lti_consumer/__init__.py
• changelog: https://github.com/openedx/xblock-lti-consumer/blob/master/CHANGELOG.rst

[shadinaif]

please check now @OmarIthawi

[OmarIthawi]

Thanks Shadi. One more thing please.

[OmarIthawi]

Looks good to me. Thanks @shadinaif!!

[mphilbrick211]

Hi @OmarIthawi and @shadinaif! Is this pull request still needed?

[OmarIthawi]

Yes @mphilbrick211, we needed it to get merged but it wasn't triaged since Jan 25th.

@shadinaif there's a new changelog update that conflicts with this pull request, kindly rebase and fix it.

[shadinaif]

Rebased. But codecov is failing for no reason ¯\(ツ)/¯