Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @types/sinon to v17 #2215

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@types/sinon (source) 10.0.18 -> 17.0.3 age adoption passing confidence
@types/sinon (source) ^10.0.11 -> ^17.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on Friday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.37%. Comparing base (dfb2dff) to head (b5fd63a).
Report is 128 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2215      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.97%   90.37%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files         146      147       +1     
  Lines        7492     7502      +10     
  Branches     1502     1571      +69     
==========================================
- Hits         6816     6780      -36     
- Misses        676      722      +46     

see 43 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment