Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Pool to store and reuse GZIPWriters #1329

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-branch.v6
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

trams
Copy link

@trams trams commented May 13, 2020

GZIPWriter are very expensive to create and leads
to allocating a lot of memory. They are perfect for reusing
(they have .reset method for this)

I profiled a web service inside my company and I noticed that creation of GZipWriter is responsible for 20% of memory allocation (in bytes).

Inspired by
https://www.akshaydeo.com/blog/2017/12/23/How-did-I-improve-latency-by-700-percent-using-syncPool/
https://dzone.com/articles/memory-pooling-in-go-where-why-and-how

Could you help me to run unit tests?

I noticed there is a shell script ./run-es.sh which worked after I did
sudo sysctl -w vm.max_map_count=262144 (my workstation is linux)

But go test . still fails for a lot of tests with

--- FAIL: TestSearchFilterPath (0.01s)
    setup_test.go:348: elastic: Error 400 (Bad Request): request [/elastic-test] contains unrecognized parameter: [include_type_name] [type=illegal_argument_exception]

I am quite puzzled

I also learned that I probably misuse defer (cause it is in the loop)
Current proposal with additional parameter looks a bit ugly too.
I will appreciate your feedback. This is my first pull request in go project (I am new to go)

GZIPWriter are very expensive to create and leads
to allocating a lot of memory. They are perfect for reusing
(they have .reset method for this)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant