Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary cargo-semver-checks comment from main.yml #229

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 4, 2023
Merged

Remove unnecessary cargo-semver-checks comment from main.yml #229

merged 2 commits into from May 4, 2023

Conversation

mgr0dzicki
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! I'm one of the contributors of cargo-semver-checks. I noticed the use of cargo-semver-checks-action that is commented out in your CI.

Since we've recently released a new, completely rebuilt V2 version of the GitHub action, you can now conveniently use it in your workflow. It fixes the problems of outdated V1 and includes huge improvements of the running time. I suggested adding a job semver-checks, which seems to work well now. I hope it will be useful!

@oli-obk
Copy link
Owner

oli-obk commented May 3, 2023

Uh... @obi1kenobi recently did #227

Without having looked at the PR here, how do these changes relate?

@obi1kenobi
Copy link
Collaborator

obi1kenobi commented May 3, 2023

Ah sorry, I forgot to clean up the old comment. cargo-semver-checks is actually used in the release.yml file, not in the main one since that one is CI-only.

I upgraded the release-side one to the v2 action already: 6489ef6

Let's just delete the commented-out lines.

@mgr0dzicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, and my mistake is that I haven't checked the other workflow file, sorry for that!

Co-authored-by: Predrag Gruevski <2348618+obi1kenobi@users.noreply.github.com>
@mgr0dzicki mgr0dzicki changed the title Use cargo-semver-checks-action to run semver checks Remove unnecessary cargo-semver-checks comment from main.yml May 3, 2023
@obi1kenobi
Copy link
Collaborator

Oh, and my mistake is that I haven't checked the other workflow file, sorry for that!

No worries, thanks to your PR we've now deleted the problematic lines so we won't have this confusion again! :)

@obi1kenobi obi1kenobi merged commit 8856575 into oli-obk:main May 4, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants