BUG: Fix small valgrind-found issues (#18651) #18661
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* BUG: Fix small valgrind-found issues This should be backportable. There was at least one that I could not reproduce when running the tests again. And the new random-shuffle tests give false-positives (which is just slightly annoying, considering that we are very close to almost only "longdouble" related false-positives) * BUG: Add missing decref in user-dtype fallback paths The missing decref here only leaks references and can never leak actual memory fortunately. * MAINT,TST: Simplify the "refcount logic" in the dispatch tests again Using SETREF can be nice, but was just overcomplicating thing here...
charris
added
00 - Bug
component: numpy._core
08 - Backport
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #18651.
This should be backportable. There was at least one that I could
not reproduce when running the tests again. And the new random-shuffle
tests give false-positives (which is just slightly annoying, considering
that we are very close to almost only "longdouble" related
false-positives)
The missing decref here only leaks references and can never leak
actual memory fortunately.
Using SETREF can be nice, but was just overcomplicating thing here...