Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README to reflect valid values for validateInResponseTo #875

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

adamandreasson
Copy link

Description

The updated documentation reflects the changes I proposed in my issue: #874

The documentation is outdated and after node-saml v4, just passing a truthy value does not affect the validateInResponseTo setting. node-saml expects a valid value, which my other PR enforces: node-saml/node-saml#314

@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ Please see the [type specification](https://github.com/node-saml/node-saml/blob/

##### **InResponseTo Validation**

- `validateInResponseTo`: if truthy, then InResponseTo will be validated from incoming SAML responses
- `validateInResponseTo`: if set to `always` or `ifPresent`, then InResponseTo will be validated from incoming SAML responses. The default setting is `never`, so this setting needs to be set if you want to validate incoming SAML responses.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's change the default to "always" for master and have another PR that uses this verbiage against the 4.x branch.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no 4.x branch in this repo

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (96f49d2) 64.42% compared to head (b80f7db) 64.42%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #875   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.42%   64.42%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         149      149           
  Branches       37       37           
=======================================
  Hits           96       96           
  Misses         30       30           
  Partials       23       23           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cjbarth cjbarth added pending-refinement documentation Request for or contribution to documentation labels Aug 18, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 7, 2023

This PR is stale because is has been open for 90 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Dec 7, 2023
@cjbarth
Copy link
Collaborator

cjbarth commented Mar 6, 2024

Closed by #886

@cjbarth cjbarth closed this Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Request for or contribution to documentation pending-refinement stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants