Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve trienode serialization performance by vendoring postcard #2249

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

hrxi
Copy link
Contributor

@hrxi hrxi commented Feb 23, 2024

The PR to postcard is unlikely to get merged anytime soon. We could instead vendor postcard and get the performance this way.

Alternative to #2156.

@sisou
Copy link
Member

sisou commented Feb 24, 2024

With other forked dependencies we use(d) forked Github repos as the dependency location in the Cargo.toml files, instead of putting the whole code into this repo.

@jsdanielh
Copy link
Contributor

With other forked dependencies we use(d) forked Github repos as the dependency location in the Cargo.toml files, instead of putting the whole code into this repo.

Yeah, I'd second this option instead

@hrxi hrxi force-pushed the hrxi/postcard_bytes branch 2 times, most recently from 2de286a to 35fec90 Compare May 22, 2024 12:36
Copy link
Contributor

@jsdanielh jsdanielh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jsdanielh jsdanielh merged commit e983d05 into albatross May 22, 2024
6 checks passed
@jsdanielh jsdanielh deleted the hrxi/postcard_bytes branch May 22, 2024 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants