Alternate approach to remove Log4J 1.x dependency ( see #11264 ) #11265
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Removes flag by Whitesource vulnerability scanner
This reverts commit 7c04e3d.
Leaving classes intact
|
The |
|
Let's close this as we will use #11264 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
WhiteSource vulnerability scan flags the Log4J 1.x stream as vulnerable.
Modification:
Replaced referenced to Log4J 1.x with Log4J 2.x, updated code.
This is an alternate approach to #11264 - I wasn't sure which would be preferable
Ran mvn test (on a Mac) sucessfully
Result:
Fixes #11263.
If inappropriate, close both requests