Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rust: 1.68.2 -> 1.69.0 #8937

Merged
merged 15 commits into from Apr 28, 2023
Merged

rust: 1.68.2 -> 1.69.0 #8937

merged 15 commits into from Apr 28, 2023

Conversation

nagisa
Copy link
Collaborator

@nagisa nagisa commented Apr 21, 2023

Upgrade to this long awaited nice version that just so happened to have been released on a particularly well timed occassion.

Upgrade to this long awaited nice version that just so happened to have
been released on a particularly well timed occassion.
@nagisa nagisa requested a review from a team as a code owner April 21, 2023 10:29
@nagisa nagisa requested a review from nikurt April 21, 2023 10:29
@nagisa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nagisa commented Apr 21, 2023

Oh, this will be all sorts of fun!

@nagisa nagisa removed the request for review from nikurt April 21, 2023 13:03
@nagisa nagisa marked this pull request as draft April 21, 2023 13:03
These don't appear to be doing much in terms of useful and now that the
compiler is more stringent in testing what `#[proc_macro_attribute]` is
allowed to take as an argument these are broken too without more intense
changes.
@nagisa nagisa marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2023 13:05
@nagisa nagisa requested a review from Ekleog-NEAR April 25, 2023 13:06
@nagisa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nagisa commented Apr 25, 2023

The test failure is clap-rs/clap#4857. The best way forward, I think, is to upgrade clap.

10913823971520273759,
17423008210698923502,
7011050181604188333,
15514788595649734538,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm I’m curious, do you know why the hashes changed? I wouldn’t expect a rustc upgrade to change the hashes of wasmer binaries

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rkyv is sensitive to repr(Rust) layout changes, unless the strict feature is enabled. Unfortunately that is something we cannot enable as we rely on being able to serialize tuples, and tuples are repr(Rust). So something about how stuff is laid out there has changed.

@nagisa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nagisa commented Apr 26, 2023

Blocked on #8974

@near-bulldozer near-bulldozer bot merged commit 4429ca6 into master Apr 28, 2023
2 checks passed
@near-bulldozer near-bulldozer bot deleted the nagisa/rust-1.69.0 branch April 28, 2023 10:55
jakmeier pushed a commit to jakmeier/nearcore that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
Upgrade to this long awaited nice version that just so happened to have been released on a particularly well timed occassion.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants