Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoided parallel workflow execution #2103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

mockitoguy
Copy link
Member

@mockitoguy mockitoguy commented Nov 14, 2020

Avoided parallel execution of the workflow so that:

  • we get better UX (the "checks" view in PR does not have duplicated jobs - example)
  • we run less builds (conserves build quota)

We no longer run CI for ordinary push to any remote branch. We run CI for pushes to the main dev branch or PRs.

Preventing parallel workflows is reported to GitHub and hopefully it will be resolved eventually: https://github.community/t/prevent-parallel-workflows/16370

Fixes #2097

Avoided parallel execution of the workflow so that:
 - we get better UX (the "checks" view in PR does not have duplicated jobs)
 - we run less builds (conserves build quota)

We *no longer* run CI for ordinary push to any remote branch. We run CI for pushes to the main dev branch or PRs.

Preventing parallel workflows is reported to GitHub:
https://github.community/t/prevent-parallel-workflows/16370
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider reducing CI execution footprint
2 participants