vendor: assorted vendor updates for containerd 1.7.0

[thaJeztah]

• relates to vendor: github.com/containerd/containerd v1.7.0-rc.2 #44530

Most (all?) of these are probably safe to take, or even backport to 23.0 if we want to.

vendor: golang.org/x/sys v0.6.0

full diff: golang/sys@v0.5.0...v0.6.0

vendor: github.com/imdario/mergo v0.3.13

full diff: darccio/mergo@v0.3.12...v0.3.13

vendor: github.com/opencontainers/selinux v1.11.0

full diff: opencontainers/selinux@v1.10.2...v1.11.0

vendor: github.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22 v22.5.0

full diff: coreos/go-systemd@v22.4.0...v22.5.0

vendor: github.com/godbus/dbus/v5 v5.1.0

full diff: godbus/dbus@v5.0.6...v5.1.0

vendor: github.com/klauspost/compress v1.16.3

full diff: klauspost/compress@v1.15.12...v1.16.3

vendor: github.com/opencontainers/runc v1.1.4

no changes in vendored files

full diff: opencontainers/runc@v1.1.3...v1.1.4

vendor: github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec v1.1.0-rc.1

full diff: opencontainers/runtime-spec@1c3f411...v1.1.0-rc.1

- Description for the changelog

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

[thaJeztah]

@vvoland @corhere ptal 🤗

[corhere]

One change caught my eye which I think is worth calling out: godbus/dbus@230c6f2

The static_build build tag no longer has any meaning to the dbus module, though I don't believe we need to take any action. Our build scripts set both osusergo and static_build already, and it doesn't look like we can get rid of the static_build tag as it is still used in build constraints in a few of our own packages.

[thaJeztah]

One change caught my eye which I think is worth calling out: godbus/dbus@230c6f2

The static_build build tag no longer has any meaning to the dbus module, though I don't believe we need to take any action. Our build scripts set both osusergo and static_build already, and it doesn't look like we can get rid of the static_build tag as it is still used in build constraints in a few of our own packages.

Yes, I noticed that change as well