Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added unit test with 304 response #166

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Haimantika
Copy link

Solves #163

@Haimantika Haimantika requested a review from a team as a code owner April 9, 2024 09:20
Copy link
Member

@andrueastman andrueastman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any chance you can double check the build issue @Haimantika

@Haimantika
Copy link
Author

Any chance you can double check the build issue @Haimantika

The new commit should solve it.

@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ const ErrorBodyFoundAttributeName = "com.microsoft.kiota.error.body_found"
func (a *NetHttpRequestAdapter) throwIfFailedResponse(ctx context.Context, response *nethttp.Response, errorMappings abs.ErrorMappings, spanForAttributes trace.Span) error {
ctx, span := otel.GetTracerProvider().Tracer(a.observabilityOptions.GetTracerInstrumentationName()).Start(ctx, "throwIfFailedResponse")
defer span.End()
if response.StatusCode < 400 {
if response.StatusCode < 400 || response.StatusCode == nethttp.StatusNotModified {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't 304 included in the range of values <400? I don't see why explicitly checking for 304 would change the behavior here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideally, yes. So should we skip it?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Haimantika I think what we should is probably revert this then add a unit test that captures the scenario that is decribed in #163 in this file

func TestItThrowsApiError(t *testing.T) {

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is helpful! Thanks @andrueastman I will work on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Todo 📃
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants