microsoft ebpf-for-windows Q-a Discussions
Q&A Discussions
Ask the community for help
-
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote should eBPF for Windows allow multi-level nesting in map-in-map?
help wantedExtra attention is needed -
You must be logged in to vote BPF program should not delete outer map entries in map-in-map
bugSomething isn't working -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote Should _ebpf_epoch_cpu_table[cpu_id].thread_table switch to a lock-free hash table?
optimizationAffects perf but not correctness or applicability -
You must be logged in to vote Should _ebpf_epoch_cpu_table[cpu_id].free_list switch to using an InterlockedSList?
optimizationAffects perf but not correctness or applicability -
You must be logged in to vote Hypothesis: _ebpf_hash_table_replace_bucket bloats epoch free list
enhancementNew feature or request ebpf-kmPR/Issues for kernel mode components -
You must be logged in to vote
