Change License to Apache-2 #488
Open
+202
−661
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
majst01
requested review from
chbmuc,
mwennrich,
ulrichSchreiner,
mwindower,
vknabel,
Gerrit91,
robertvolkmann,
muhittink,
mreiger,
michaelottofits and
iljarotar
Gerrit91
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2024
vknabel
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2024
robertvolkmann
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2024
|
We chose the AGPL to make sure that anyone else using and improving the core components, has to contribute back. I'm not convinced that a more liberal license would really foster the use of metal-stack in a way that we get more contributions, even though they don't need to contribute any longer. |
|
I never understood all the FUD against copyleft licenses... |
It actually prevented one potential contributor to even start using it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We had AGPL because we wanted to enforce third parties which eventually use also metal-stack to contribute back their enhancements. We did not get any external contributions to metal-api in the past. AGPL is also a forbidden LICENSE for a lot of companies to contribute to which might be the reason why we did not get any. Other repos in our org, which are Apache-2.0 or MIT licensed, did get quite a lot of contributions.
I added a lot of reviewers which contributed in the past to let everyone know about my proposed change.